Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Samuel Puskar vs Matic Kriznik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Puskar vs Kriznik analysis and find out who is favored!
Samuel Puskar vs Matic Kriznik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Puskar 0 - 0 Kriznik
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Puskar has won 48.72% of points on their second serve, while Kriznik has won 45.42%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Puskar, in recent form, has won 49.87% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kriznik has won 51.91%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.67% and 29.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Puskar has saved 50.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kriznik has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Puskar has won 63.33% of matches played (W/L 38/ 22), with Kriznik winning 35.48% (W/L 11/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Puskar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 28/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 4/ 10). Kriznik has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Puskar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.33% of matches (W/L 38/ 22), where as Kriznik has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 35.48% of matches (W/L 11/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Puskar has played against opponents with an average rank of 13.63 while Kriznik has played against players with an average rank of 187.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Puskar has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kriznik has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Puskar has converted 37.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kriznik has converted 44.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
52% (101-92)
Career Total W/L
33% (13-26)
59% (13-9)
YTD W/L
32% (6-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Samuel Puskar | Matic Kriznik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (13/9) | 32% (6/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (30/22) | 36% (15/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (249/224) | 44% (164/212) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 69% (9/4) | 25% (2/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 36% (4/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 23 | 33 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 36 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:40:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 131.21 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (591/1020) | 57% (616/1078) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (367/591) | 64% (394/616) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (209/429) | 45% (210/462) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (36/96) | 44% (44/99) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (355/944) | 39% (444/1141) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 59% (13/9) | 32% (6/13) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (13/22) | 28% (5/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 40% (10/4) | 8% (13/1) |
Samuel Puskar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Samuel Puskar
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonio Voljavec
Player
Samuel Puskar
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
5-7 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Samuel Puskar
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Samuel Puskar
Player
Nik Mikovic
49%
(
47 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
92)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuel Puskar
Player
Matthias Ujvary
61%
(
67 of
110)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
44 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Nicod
Player
Samuel Puskar
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Markus Malaszszak
Player
Samuel Puskar
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Matic Kriznik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Kupcic
Player
Matic Kriznik
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
47%
(
44 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Matic Kriznik
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Matic Kriznik
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Matic Kriznik
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matic Kriznik
Player
Paul Werren
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Matic Kriznik
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matic Kriznik
Player
Romain Faucon
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dev Javia
Player
Matic Kriznik
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matic Kriznik
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
38%
(
9 of
24)
1st Serve %
62%
(
8 of
13)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
22
Total Points Won
15
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Puskar Vs Kriznik Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Puskar are available here and Kriznik photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
